Background:
the Arab gulf states have been expanding and developing
their military powers since the first Gulf war but the process developed to arm
race after the second Gulf war when the GCC states felt the need for protecting
themselves after Kuwait paid an expensive prices for the second Gulf war, add
to that the real threat of the Iranian
desire to own their own nuclear power plus the recent improvement in the
Iranian missile arsenals which consider one of the strongest regionally and
internationally; according to some experts.
The Gulf states have been always in competitive relationship
even in the best times, the situation there were no peace no war, but Iraq
played the role of balancing power for some time, during the 1970s - 1980s not
only against Iran but on some occasions against Israel too, but after the second Gulf war when Iraq as a military power was eliminated the
region system lacked the existence of balance of power which leads to the
current hidden arm race between Iran and the GCC countries accompanied by Iraq.
Arm Race -
reasons and results:
It is not a secret that Iran posses the strongest military
power after Israel in the region, and that led the GCC states to increase their
military capabilities significantly during the past few years. The Financial Times revealed the intention of some GCC states to spend over $100 billion on
arms deals for advanced military equipment including; PAC3, C-130J Jets, Typhoon jets, Boeing F-15SA fighter jets and upgrade for F- 15s from USA
and UK during the upcoming 4 years.
Generally speaking the ongoing arm race in the region
reflects the desire to exert influence and control more than defense; according
to some experts the possibility of bombing or sending Iranian missile to Riyadh
or Dubai are almost rare compared to applying the same hypothesis on Israel
which could explain why these states desire to buy air and Naval equipment and
not giving so much attention to Ground equipment which might give them the advantage, though the GCC states cannot develop a balance of force in comparison to Iran.
So what is the real reason behind
the ongoing arms race in the Gulf region? In order to answer this question we
must head into the political interests behind it.... It has been known since
the U.S. war on Iraq that the United States is seeking to protect its strategic
interests in the region, especially after the failure in addressing the
expansion of Iran and the failure of all scenarios in containing Iran's nuclear
activity, the United States established a security alliance with the oil rich
Gulf states in a desperate attempt to confronting Iranian power and which
may pose a threat to U.S. interests in the region, not only through its control
over the Strait of Hormuz and which handles most Gulf oil supplies, but also as
a regional power equivalent to Israel and overwhelm most of the neighboring
countries which led the United States to bless the ongoing arms race in the
region, but that was not the only goal for establishing a strategic security
alliance, also the arms deals with the rich Gulf states contributed to run arms
factories in the United States and the United Kingdom after the economic crisis
that hit the economy in Europe and U.S. making it clear that the goal behind
encouraging the arms race in the Gulf states is not a purely strategic goal,
but had other targets serve industrialized nations that dominating the arms
industry. But what is the real result of such an alliance.... Could it really
make a balance of powers in the region, or is it creating a crisis waiting to
explode at any time?
According to experts, the arms race in the Gulf region has
had disadvantages more than advantages; though this race awakened the Gulf
states on the fact that the United States would not exist always to protect
them, but in return provided an area full of religious and regional conflicts
with modern and advanced weapon technologies that might be used incorrectly
and in destructive manner in conflicts which can be solved diplomatically before
the arm race era, taking into account the growing tension between Iran and the
Gulf states, which represented by the conflicts in the lands of Iraq and
Bahrain, which are Saudi Arabia and Iran are the hidden hands behind these
conflicts.
Prospective Scenarios:
The possible scenarios for the evolution of this situation
in the region may not be realistic in an area of permanent variables, because
what is realistic according to today's current data may not be the case in a few
months, but through the possibilities of current situation, the region is
subject to two scenarios: first the increasing intensity of conflict and the
imposition of control, pushing the Iranian and the Gulf into a regional war and
it is the most probable and realistic scenarios in light of the increasing
tension between Shiites backed by Iran in some areas of the Gulf and its
neighbors (Bahrain - Iraq - Kuwait - eastern Saudi Arabia - Northern Yemen -
Lebanon) and the Sunnis, backed by the official sponsorship of Saudi Arabia and
the rest of the states, who sees the Shiites as a expansion of Iranian
control.
The second scenario would be the potential establishment of a broad
coalition with the countries of the region and that border Iran and the Arabian
Gulf to include Yemen, Iraq and the United States; as supporter for the
alliance, which will put Iran in front of a difficult choice, they will not be
able to engage in an armed conflict with more than one party and risking its
future in the region.
Despite the difficulty of achieving this
scenario, it could be a strategic solution best suit the arms race in the Gulf
region and the parties involved.
No comments:
Post a Comment